Trump states that Biden’s forgives for the January 6 committee are ‘null’. Legal experts do not agree

President Donald Trump is pointing to one of the final acts of his predecessor in office: preventive pardons for the members of the January Chamber of the Select Committee of January 6.

In a publication of nocturnal social networks, Trump said without evidence that President Joe Biden used an autopilot to sign the pardons and, therefore, considered them “declared vacancies, vacancies and without more strength or effect.”

Trump, who made a remuneration against his political enemies perceived a focal point of his 2024 campaign, said the members of the committee should “completely understand that they are subject to an investigation at the highest level” although there are no findings of irregularities.

Despite his statements, legal experts told ABC News that Trump does not have the power to cancel Biden’s actions.

The Clemency Power of a President is acquired in article II of the Constitution and is “broad and practically unlimited,” said Jeffrey Crouch, assistant professor at the American University and an expert in presidential pardons.

Its few restrictions include that it can only be applied to federal crimes and cannot interfere with the powers of political trial of Congress.

In 1929, a memorandum of the attorney general of the Attorney General on Pardones argued that “neither the Constitution nor any statute prescribe the method by which the executive clemency will be exercised or will be avoided.”

“It is totally an issue that the president decides, as a practical issue of administrative policy,” the department said. “No one but the president can exercise power, but the power that the method of making a record has been exercised and their evidence is a mere detail that can prescribe according to what he considers the practical needs and properties of the situation.”

The memorandum was summoned in a Federal Court of Appeals Court Last year, he said that pellets do not necessarily have to be in writing.

And although the autonos (mechanical devices used to automatically add a signature to a document) have been subject to scrutiny in the past, the Department of Justice as recently as 2005 determined that they were constitutional and could be used for a president to sign a bill in a study commissioned by the then President George W. Bush.

Former President Barack Obama used an automatic pilot to extend the patriotic law, avoid a fiscal crisis and more during his administration. Other presidents, including Lyndon B. Johnson and John F. Kennedy, are also documented that they have used the device or a similar one.

“If the automatic pilot is illegal, many of the actions and regulations that the presidents have carried out during the last four or five decades are void and null. It is a ridiculous argument,” said Elaine Kamarck, the main member of governance studies at the Brookings institution.

“There is nothing in the Constitution that requires a forgiveness to be signed without an automatic pilot. Obviously, that is, an invention of the twentie University of the University of North Carolina.

ABC News has asked the Biden team and the current White House for more information about automatic use, but has not received comments.

On board Air Force One on Sunday night, Trump was asked if any executive order or Biden action that included an autopilot would be considered void.

“It is not my decision, that will depend on a court,” Trump replied, “but I would say they are null and null because I am sure I had no idea that I was taking place, and someone was using an automatic pilot to sign and give forgiveness.”

The White House Secretary, Karoline Leavitt, also suggested, without evidence, that Biden was not aware that her signature was placed to the pardons.

“Was your legal signature used without your consent or knowledge?” Leavitt said during Monday’s informative session.

When he was specifically asked if the White House lawyers told Trump that he has the legal authority to undo a forgiveness because he was signed by Autopen, Leavitt said Trump was only “begging the question that I think many journalists in this room should be asking.”

Biden issued the Indults of the hour of the hour only a few hours before Trump’s possession. He spoke several times in his final interviews with the media about how he was considering such an option for the people that they feared they could be attacked in the next administration, such as Liz Cheney or Anthony Fauci.

What would happen if Trump tries to ignore or challenge Biden’s action?

“I could open a pandora box if a acting president tries to undo a forgiveness of one of his predecessors. The best rule would be that the forgives, either perceived as” good “or” bad “decisions, should be definitive,” said Crouch.

Molly Nagle and Nicholas Kerr of ABC News contributed to this report.